![]() ![]() The Test Internet Speed page will open, note the speeds if anyĪctual Results: An error will be thrown stating Failed to test the speed.Once on the app's dashboard locate the internet speed section and select it.Locate the Tether app on your phone and select the app.Locate the Run Test or Test Again button and select it to run the testĪctual Results: The speed report will load under a second and show the same speeds as beforeĮxpected Results: Speed Test will take at least a few seconds and report a new set of speeds each time a test is run.Scroll down to the bottom of the webpage and locate the Speed Test section.Select the Speed Test icon that shows between the Internet Globe icon and the Router icon.Click on the Basic tab if not already selected.Login into the TP-Link router dashboard if needed.Please try again later.įirmware: 1.2.5 Build 20211208 rel.49262 (updated )īrowser(s) Tested: Firefox, Edge, Chrome, Tor Speedtest via TP-Link Tether returns Failed to test the speed. ![]() Speedtest via browser returns the same numbers each time Run Test or Test Again is selected Please try again later." So as to simplify this In the app I get "Failed to test the speed. The TP-Link dashboard for web browsers, the typical 192.168.0.1, loads fine, When you run the test it responds back the same numbers in a second or less. I have resolved the issue with the internet connectivity with my ISP and other connectivity issues with the Archer but Speedtest doesn't do its thing. Over the last 36 hours I have been experiencing some issues with speeds, connectivity and the built in Speedtest by Ookla. So speed, accuracy, reliability and security are EXTREMELY important. This is more of a me thing because I download on average 200GB a day as I am a "software" tester (not REALLY software, its unreleased video games for MSFT). On a daily basis I check my speeds before I start working. I have had very little if any issue with it up until now. I have been using the AX6000 for the better part of the last 20+ months in a very high capacity. I am beginning to think that the speedtest is highly unreliable.Skip this if you do not care about the story and go to Issue: I can't understand how this is possible.Īlso - regarding doing multiple tests concurrently - I have run as many a 4 tests at the same time with wildly different speeds that average well over 1G and has reached as much as 1.6G (!). While the browser version (no matter which browser I user) shows a speed of 300-350M, the CLI and the windows version show over 800M. I have been using the browser version for all of my testing but I have tried both the Windows (install) version and the stand-alone line (CLI) version. My issue is actually with the speedtest itself. They have tested the local drop with their equipment and told me that the problem lies there - it is incapable of over 500M and with a number of local users I'm lucky to get the speed I do get. They have reset and swapped out the modem multiple times with no improvement. I have had Rogers techs here 4 times and every one of them have had exactly the same speeds when they do their tests. ![]() ![]() My average speed for January 2020 was 320.71M with over 150 speed tests). In summary I have seen speeds of about 300-350M for many months now (I have the 1G plan). I have documented my speed problems at length here in September/October or 2019. The code is so bad, and because its not loading in the part, it doesnt load the rest I have seen sites, which will only load like 3 lines of the site then thats it, because of the blockers. They are a good thing.īut sometime its the SITE thats the problem, even if they are not trying to do something bad I completely understand the need and how/why people due use the blockers. Its quite possible, for recording and/or keeping past speed test results, location, etc, that its just trying to write a cookie to the machine to store that information. Yes, this is used primarily by Ads, where the specific add company when you go to say walmarts site, it writes to a cookie on your machine (or collects to their side) that you visited there, and then when you go somewhere else, reads that you went there and shows you walmarts on that site as well, etc. "Privacy Badger was born out of our desire to be able to recommend a single extension that would automatically analyze and block any tracker or ad that violated the principle of user consent which could function well without any settings, knowledge, or configuration by the user which is produced by an organization that is unambiguously working for its users rather than for advertisers and which uses algorithmic methods to decide what is and isn't tracking."īUT from that description, its based on anything which 'tracks' any information. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |